The B.C. Economy in Transition

May 3, 2010 in Current Events, economy policy, provincial politics | Comments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Last Friday, a paper that I prepared on the BC economy was released. I hope readers will find it of interest. The paper can be found at:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30728436/Looking-Forward-The-BC-Economy-at-a-Crossroads

The paper was prepared at the request of the Leader of the BC Official Opposition, who wanted a background study and analysis of the economy. My only conditions in agreeing to do so were that I have sole control over the content and that it be made publicly available. It was also used as a background paper for a conference convened by her on Friday.
The paper is largely a diagnostic. I want it to contribute to to a better understanding of the BC economy, as a necessary prerequisite for having a literate discussion about policy. I thus deliberately do not address specific policy measures to any significant degree.

I hope that readers will come away from reading the paper seeing that there are real concerns about the BC economy and the way that it has developed over the past few years. I also hope that it acts as a cautionary tale to those who hold many of the conventional wisdoms about what contributes to improved productivity, investment in research and development, and a transition to higher value activity. The proponents of the favourite themes of the last few years in BC – lower taxes and de-regulation – appear to have paid little or no attention to what has actually been happening. If they had, one would think they would show a bit more modesty in their claims. The truth is that BC has been a laboratory for their favourite ideas, but is lagging badly in all of the referenced measures. By way of interest, the problems I identify are substantiated by a paper just released by the BC Business Council, which for instance shows BC (shockingly) to be the only province in Canada for which business productivity dropped from 2003 and 2009.

I hope the paper will encourage some good discussion. And I hope that reading it and other papers will incline the academic and other purveyors of established ideas to be at least a bit more modest and to develop bit more of the healthy skepticism required of a good analyst.

Comments (0)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment